Enhancing competitive response to market challenges with a strategic intelligence maturity model
Keywords:Capability maturity model, intelligence provider, opportunity captor, opportunity defender, strategic intelligence, vigilant learner
AbstractTracking meaningful insights about companies’ exposures to high risk of failure in competitive markets, intelligence studies in business should listen to practitioners’ signals and act in providing decision making support to systematic scanning for valuable information. In order to gain robustness in confronting unexpected events in real markets, companies should adopt an unstructured learning perspective with maturity assessment tools, while purposely pooling strategic intelligence (SI) skills. By bridging organizational maturity modeling with a future orientation stream of literature and intelligence studies in business, this conceptual research aims to highlight a genuine Strategic Intelligence Capability Maturity Model (SI CMM), capable of purposely addressing the challenge of aligning detective and anticipatory organizational capabilities. The conceptual model highlights the degree of preparedness of four SI profiles behaviors (intelligence provider, vigilant learner, opportunity captor and opportunity defender – previously developed by the authors) against seven levels of maturity. The SI CMM framework outlines both conditioned scanning capabilities (the first five SI readiness levels) and enablers to anticipate future market trends (the last two SI readiness levels). The novel approach of the strategic intelligence readiness framework supplies companies with a valuable organizational learning tool to close the skills gap through an opportunity provider profile. The main features lie in coordination and sharing SI common knowledge to enhance preparedness in forward-looking competitive pressures. The conceptual framework invites academia and the community of intelligence experts in business to evaluate the relevance of the new conceptualization, clarity of constructs and complementary nature of correlation and causation with the proposed SI CMM model
Bleoju, G., & Capatina, A. (2015). Leveraging organizational knowledge vision through Strategic Intelligence profiling-the case of the Romanian software industry. Journal of Intelligence Studies in Business, 5(2).
Calof, J., Richards, G. and Santilli, P. (2017) Insight through open intelligence. Journal of Intelligence Studies in Business. 7 (3) 62-73.
Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 284-295.
D'Aveni, R. A. (2002). Competitive pressure systems: Mapping and managing multimarket contact. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(1), 39.
Fouskas, K. G., & Drossos, D. A. (2010). The role of industry perceptions in competitive responses. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(4), 477-494.
Gilad, B. (2011). Strategy without intelligence, intelligence without strategy. Business Strategy Series, 12(1), 4-11. Højland, J., & Rohrbeck, R. (2018). The role of corporate foresight in exploring new markets– evidence from 3 case studies in the BOP markets. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(6), 734-746. Lesca,
H., & Lesca, N. (2011). Weak Signals for Strategic Intelligence. ISTE, London Lesca, H., & Lesca, N. (2013). Weak signals for strategic intelligence: anticipation tool for managers. John Wiley & Sons.
Liebowitz, J. (2006). Strategic intelligence: business intelligence, competitive intelligence, and knowledge management. Auerbach Publications.
Oubrich, M., Hakmaoui, A., Bierwolf, R., & Haddani, M. (2018). Development of a competitive intelligence maturity model: Insights from Moroccan companies. Journal of Intelligence Studies in Business, 8(1).
Ritala, P., & Sainio, L. M. (2014). Coopetition for radical innovation: technology, market and business-model perspectives. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26(2), 155169. Rohrbeck, R. &
Gemünden, H. G. (2011). Corporate foresight: its three roles in enhancing the innovation capacity of a firm. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(2), 231-243.
Rohrbeck, R. (2010). Corporate foresight: towards a maturity model for the future orientation of a firm. Springer Science & Business Media.
Rohrbeck, R., Etingue Kum, M., Jissink, T., & Gordon, A. V. (2018). Corporate Foresight Benchmarking Report 2018: How Leading Firms Build a Superior Position in Markets of the Future.
Schoemaker, P. J., Heaton, S., & Teece, D. (2018). Innovation, dynamic capabilities, and leadership. California Management Review, 61(1), 15-42.
Søilen, K. S. (2016). A research agenda for intelligence studies in business. Journal of Intelligence Studies in Business, 6(1).
Søilen, K. S. (2018). Why you should be interested in intelligence studies. Journal of Intelligence Studies in Business, 8(3).
LicenseAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).