A new model for identifying emerging technologies

Stephanie F. Hughes

Abstract


Today, the complexity of so many emerging technologies requires an
understanding of adjacent technologies often originating from multiple industries. Technology sequence analysis has been used by organizations, governments and industries to help make sense of the many variables impacting the evolution of technologies. This technique relies heavily on the input of experts who can offer perspectives on the status of current technologies
while also highlighting the potential opportunities in the future. However, the volume and speed at which scientific research is accelerating is making it nearly impossible for even the most knowledgeable expert to stay current with research in their own industries. Today however, the use of big data search tools can help identify emerging trends around disruptive technologies
well before many of the experts have fully grasped the impact of these technologies. Despite the fear of many in the intelligence community that these tools will make their jobs obsolete, we expect that the value of the intelligence expert will increase given their unique knowledge of relevant data sources and how to connect the data in meaningful ways to derive value for the firm. We propose a new forecasting model that incorporates a combination of technology
sequencing analysis and big data tools within the organization while also leveraging experts from across the open innovation spectrum. This new model, informed by current client engagements, has the potential to create significant competitive advantages for organizations as they benefit from expanded search breadth, search depth and search speed all while leveraging a range of internal and external experts to make sense of the rapidly changing
technological landscape confronting their environment.


Keywords


Big data analytics, competitive intelligence, emerging technology, open innovation, technology sequence analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abbott, A. (1990). A primer on sequence methods.

Organization Science, (4), 375-392.

Adair, W.L. & Brett, J.M. (2005). The negotiation

dance: Time, culture, and behavioral

sequences in negotiation, Organization

Science, 16(1), 33-51.

Bernstein, E. (December, 2016). The Global R&D

Funding Forecast, R&D Magazine, Winter, 1-

Bishop, P., Hines, A., & Collins, T. (2007). The

current state of scenario development: An

overview of techniques. Foresight, (1). 5-25.

Cheng, C.C. & Huizingh, E.K. (2014). When is

open innovation beneficial? The role of

strategic orientation. Journal of Product

Innovation Management, (6), 1235-1253.

Chesbrough, H., (2003). Open Innovation: The

New Imperative for Creating and Profiting

from Technology. Harvard Business School

Press, Boston, MA.

Christenson, C. (2000). The Innovator’s Dilemma:

The Revolutionary Book That Will Change the

Way You Do Business, HarpersCollins

Publisher. New York, New York.

Cohen, W.M. & Levinthal, D.A. (1990).

Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on

learning and innovation. Administrative

Science Quarterly, (1), 128-152.

European Union Open Data Portal. (2016).

Retrieved from

https://data.europa.eu/euodp/en/data/

Gassmann, O., & Enkel, E. (2004). Towards a

theory of open innovation: Three core process

archetypes. Proceeding of R&D Management

Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, July.

Gilad, B. (1996). Early warning: Using

Competitive Intelligence to Anticipate Market

Shifts, Control Risk, and Create Powerful

Strategies, AMACOM, New York, NY.

Greco, M., Grimaldi, M., & Cricelli, L. (2016). An

analysis of the open innovation effect on firm

performance. European Management Journal,

, 501-516.

Herzog, P. (2008). Open and Closed Innovation.

Different Cultures for Different Strategies.

Gabler, Wiesbaden.

Hwang, J. & Lee, Y. (2010). External Knowledge

search, innovative performance and

productivity in the Korean ICT sector.

Telecommunications Policy, 34 (10), 562-571.

Inauen, M. & Schenker-Wicki, A. (2012).

Fostering radical innovations with open

innovation. European Journal of Innovation

Management, 15 (2), 212-231.

Kajikawa, Y., Takeda, Y., & Matsushima, K.

(2010). Computer-assisted roadmapping: A

case study in energy research. Foresight, (2).

-15.

Kostoff, R.N., & Schaller, R.R. (2001). Science

and technology Roadmaps, IEEE Transactions

on Engineering Management, 48, 132-43.

Perks, H. & Roberts, D. (2013). A Review of

Longitudinal Research in the Product

Innovation Field, with Discussion of Utility

and Conduct of Sequence Analysis. Journal of

Product Innovation Management, Nov. 2013,

(6), 1099-1111

Parida, V., Westerberg, M., & Frishammar, J.,

(2012). Inbound open innovation activities in

high-tech SMEs: the impact on innovation

performance. Journal of Small Business

Management, 50 (2), 283–309

Pentland, B. T. (2003). Sequential variety in work

processes. Organization Sciences, 14 (5). 528-

Perks, H., Gruber, T., & Edvardsson, B. (2012).

Co-creation in radical service innovation: A

systematic analysis of micro-level processes.

Journal of Product Innovation Management,

, 935-951.

Perks, H. & Roberts, D. (2013). A review of

longitudinal research in the product

innovation field, with discussion of utility and

conduct of sequence analysis. Journal of

Product Innovation Management, 30 (6), 1099-

Park, A., Kim, J., Lee, H., Jang, D., & Jum, S.

(2016). Methodology of technological evolution

for three-dimensional printing. Industrial

Management & Data Systems, 116 (1), 122-

Powell, W.W., Koput, K., Smith-Doerr, L., (1996).

Interorganizational collaboration and the

locus of innovation: networks of learning in

biotechnology. Administrative Science

Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145.

Salvato, C. (2009). Capabilities unveiled: The role

of ordinary activities in the evolution of

product development processes. Organization

Science, 20(2). 384-409.

Schneider, C. (2016, May 25). The biggest data

challenges that you might not even know you

have, IBM Blog, Retrieved from

https://www.ibm.com/blogs/watson/2016/05/bi

ggest-data-challenges-might-not-even-know/

Sisodiya, S.R., Johnson, J.L., Grégoire, Y., (2013).

Inbound open innovation for enhanced

performance: enables and opportunities.

Industrial Marketing Management. 42(5),

–849.

Smith, J.E. & Saritas, O. (2010). Science and

technology foresight baker’s dozen: A pocket

primer of comparative and combined foresight

methods. Foresight, 13(2), 79-96.

Tether, B. S., & Tajar, A. (2008). Beyond industry

university links: sourcing knowledge for

innovation from consultants, private research

organizations and the public science-base.

Research Policy, 37(6), 1079-1095.

Thatchenkery, S. M., Katila, R. & Chen, E. L.

(2012). Sequences of competitive moves and

effects on firm performance. Academy of

Management Annual Meeting Proceedings.

, p1-1

U.S. Federal Government (2016). Retrieved from

https://www.data.gov/

U.S. Economic & Statistics Administration.

(2016). Retrieved from

http://www.esa.doc.gov/reports/fosteringinnovation-

creating-jobs-driving-betterdecisions-

value-government-data

Un, C. A., Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Asakawa, K.

(2010). R&D collaborations and product

innovation. Journal of Product Innovation

Management, 27(5), 673-689.

Van de Ven, A., & Poole, S. (1990). Methods for

studying innovation development in

Minnesota Innovation Research Program.

Organization Science, 1 (3), 313-335.

Vanian, J. (2016, July 15). Why Data Is The New

Oil. Fortune, Retrieved from

http://fortune.com/2016/07/11/data-oilbrainstorm-

tech/

Vaseashta, A. (2014). Advanced sciences

convergence based methods for surveillance of

emerging trends in science, technology and

intelligence. Foresight, (1), 17-36.

Wang, C.H., Chang, C.H., & Shen, G.C. (2015).

The effect of inbound open innovation on firm

performance: Evidence from high-tech

industry. Technological Forecasting & Social

Change, 99, 222-230.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Comments on this article

View all comments


JISIB is indexed by ESCI, SCOPUS, EBSCO, DOAJ, Google Scholar, EconBib and SCImago, and is ranked as a Level 1 publication by the Norwegian Social Science Data Services. JISIB has applied for admittance to Web of Science.