Characterizing business intelligence tasks, use and users in the workplace
Keywords:Business intelligence, information system use, workplace studies
AbstractThis paper investigates business intelligence (BI) tasks, use and users in aworkplace setting. The study reports on a mixed methods study of users in three different typesof organisations employing BI. 1052 respondents answered a survey and 15 individual and 3group interviews were conducted to elaborate on the survey results. The study finds that themajority of public BI users are employees, and fewer managers and students, that are handlinga variety of tasks. Although they can experience challenges learning and using the BI system,they are still satisfied with it from different perspectives.
Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L. M., & Kim, H. H. (2011).
Strength in Numbers: How Does Data-Driven
Decisionmaking Affect Firm Performance?
SSRN Electronic Journal.
Byström Katriina, & Hansen Preben. (2005).
Conceptual framework for tasks in
information studies. Journal of the American
Society for Information Science and
Technology, 56(10), 1050–1061.
Chen, H., Chiang, R. H., & Storey, V. C. (2012).
Business intelligence and analytics: From big
data to big impact. MIS Quarterly, 36(4),
Choudrie, J. (2005). Investigating the Research
Approaches for Examining Technology
Adoption Issues. Journal of Research Practice,
Crystal, A., & Ellington, B. (2004). Task analysis
and human-computer interaction: approaches,
techniques, and levels of analysis. AMCIS
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992).
Information Systems Success: The Quest for
the Dependent Variable. Information Systems
Research, 3(1), 60–95.
Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (2003). The effect
of task and tool experience on maintenance
CASE tool usage. Information Resources
Management Journal; Hershey, 16(3), 1–16.
Dörfler, A. (2003). Business process modelling
and help systems as part of KM in egovernment
(pp. 297–303). Presented at the
IFIP International Working Conference on
Knowledge Management in Electronic
Dourish, P. (2003). The Appropriation of
Interactive Technologies: Some Lessons from
Placeless Documents. Computer Supported
Cooperative Work: The Journal of
Collaborative Computing, 12(4), 465–490.
Driscoll, D. L., Appiah-Yeboah, A., Salib, P., &
Rupert, D. J. (2007). Merging qualitative and
quantitative data in mixed methods research:
How to and why not. Ecological and
Environmental Anthropology (University of
García, J. M. V., & Pinzón, B. H. D. (2017). Key
success factors to business intelligence
solution implementation. Journal of
Intelligence Studies in Business, 7(1).
Gartner Survey of More Than 2,500 CIOs Charts
the Rise of the Digital Ecosystem. (n.d.).
Retrieved March 27, 2017, from
Iivari, J. (2005). An Empirical Test of the
DeLone-McLean Model of Information System
Success. SIGMIS Database, 36(2), 8–27.
Ingwersen, P., & Järvelin, K. (2005). The Turn:
Integration of Information Seeking and
Retrieval in Context. Springer Netherlands.
Jürgensen, J. (2012). The Effects of Digitalization
of SU on the Work of SU Workers. CBS,
Kraemer, K. L., & Dedrick, J. (1997). Computing
and public organizations. Journal of Public
Administration Research and Theory, 7(1),
Li, Y., & Belkin, N. J. (2008). A faceted approach
to conceptualizing tasks in information
seeking. Information Processing &
Management, 44(6), 1822–1837.
Marshall, T. E., Byrd, T. A., Gardiner, L. R., &
Rainer, R. K. (2000). Technology Acceptance
and Performance: An Investigation into
Requisite Knowledge. Information Resources
Management Journal, 13(3), 33–45.
Negash, S., & Gray, P. (2008). Business
intelligence. In Business intelligence:
Handbook on decision support systems 2.
Berlin: Springer. Retrieved from https://doiorg.
Nielsen, J. (1994). Estimating the number of
subjects needed for a thinking aloud test.
International Journal of Human-Computer
Studies, 41(3), 385–387.
Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. R. (2013).
Information Systems Success: The Quest for
the Independent Variables. Journal of
Management Information Systems, 29(4), 7–
Rai, A., Lang, S. S., & Welker, R. B. (2002).
Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models:
An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis.
Information Systems Research, 13(1), 50–69.
Removed, A. (n.d.). Article removed.
Salmasi, M. K., Talebpour, A., & Homayounvala,
E. (2016). Identification and classification of
organizational level competencies for BI
success. Journal of Intelligence Studies in
Business, 6(2), 17–33.
Seddon, P. B., Staples, S., Patnayakuni, R., &
Bowtell, M. (1999). Dimensions of information
systems success. Communications of the AIS,
Snellen, I. (2002). Electronic governance:
implications for citizens, politicians and public
servants. International Review of
Administrative Sciences, 68(2), 183–198.
Stanton, N. A. (2006). Hierarchical task analysis:
Developments, applications, and extensions.
Applied Ergonomics, 37(1), 55–79.
Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M.
(1994). Influence of Experience on Personal
Computer Utilization: Testing a Conceptual
Model. Journal of Management Information
Systems, 11(1), 167–187.
Wixom, B., & Watson, H. (2010). The BI-Based
Organization: International Journal of
Business Intelligence Research, 1(1), 13–28.
Worley, J. H., Chatha, K. A., Weston, R. H.,
Aguirre, O., & Grabot, B. (2005).
Implementation and optimisation of ERP
systems: A better integration of processes,
roles, knowledge and user competencies.
Computers in Industry, 56(6), 620–638.
LicenseAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).